U.S. Agency for International DevelopmentvsPeace Corps
Federal Agency Comparison
| Metric | U.S. Agency for International Development | Peace Corps |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 370 | 709 |
| Avg Salary | $166,153 | $146,312 |
| Risk Score | 63/100 | 55/100 |
| RIF Count | 3,716 | 0 |
| Reduction % | 1282.7% | 44.7% |
| Retirement % | 33.5% | 35.1% |
| STEM % | 11.1% | 18.1% |
| 2025 Separations | 4,746 | 317 |
| Avg Tenure (yrs) | 16.7 | 11.1 |
| Quit Rate % | 6.3% | 79.2% |
Visual Comparison
Risk Score
63.0
55.0
U.S. Agency for International Development Peace Corps
Reduction %
1282.7
44.7
U.S. Agency for International Development Peace Corps
STEM %
11.1
18.1
U.S. Agency for International Development Peace Corps
Retirement %
33.5
35.1
U.S. Agency for International Development Peace Corps
Analysis
Peace Corps is 1.9x larger than U.S. Agency for International Development with 709 employees compared to 370. U.S. Agency for International Development faces higher workforce risk with a score of 63/100 vs 55/100 for Peace Corps. U.S. Agency for International Development pays $19,841 more on average ($166,153 vs $146,312). U.S. Agency for International Development has seen steeper workforce reductions at 1282.7% compared to 44.7% for Peace Corps.