Nuclear Regulatory CommissionvsEnvironmental Protection Agency
Federal Agency Comparison
| Metric | Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Environmental Protection Agency |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,646 | 14,661 |
| Avg Salary | $158,297 | $139,873 |
| Risk Score | 45/100 | 61/100 |
| RIF Count | 0 | 28 |
| Reduction % | 12.6% | 16.7% |
| Retirement % | 35.7% | 32.8% |
| STEM % | 62.7% | 62.9% |
| 2025 Separations | 333 | 2,442 |
| Avg Tenure (yrs) | 17.3 | 16.1 |
| Quit Rate % | 44.7% | 56.5% |
Visual Comparison
Risk Score
45.0
61.0
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental Protection Agency
Reduction %
12.6
16.7
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental Protection Agency
STEM %
62.7
62.9
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental Protection Agency
Retirement %
35.7
32.8
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Environmental Protection Agency
Analysis
Environmental Protection Agency is 5.5x larger than Nuclear Regulatory Commission with 14,661 employees compared to 2,646. Environmental Protection Agency faces higher workforce risk with a score of 61/100 vs 45/100 for Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Nuclear Regulatory Commission pays $18,424 more on average ($158,297 vs $139,873). Environmental Protection Agency has seen steeper workforce reductions at 16.7% compared to 12.6% for Nuclear Regulatory Commission.